Thursday, February 18, 2016

Sand Opera Lenten Journey Day 9: Knock and You Will Be Let In (+ Shakir Mustafa)

Sand Opera Lenten Journey Day 9

From Sand Opera:

(echo /ex/)


his name is G
                                   
                        “Do you believe in                  

                                                my broken

                                                            ark which he had made

            I lost

I lost

                        G came and laughed

                                                            lo, in her mouth

                        it will break again

arms behind

                                                broken because I can’t

sever pain

                        X

            X                                             the hard site                

                                                            while the earth remaineth              

            some pictures              

                                                shall not cease




Matthew 7:7-12

Jesus said to his disciples:
“Ask and it will be given to you;
seek and you will find;
knock and the door will be opened to you.
For everyone who asks, receives; and the one who seeks, finds;
and to the one who knocks, the door will be opened.
Which one of you would hand his son a stone
when he asked for a loaf of bread,
or a snake when he asked for a fish?
If you then, who are wicked,
know how to give good gifts to your children,
how much more will your heavenly Father give good things
to those who ask him.

“Do to others whatever you would have them do to you.
This is the law and the prophets.”

“Some pictures / shall not cease.” The poem for today lands us back into the Abu Ghraib prison, and the trauma of entrapment by the sinister “G.” I have written elsewhere that as I explored the testimonies of the abused Iraqi prisoners at Abu Ghraib, I came to think of Graner as a God-like figure, someone whose absolute power terrified and traumatized the prisoners, into a state of unceasing trauma. Today’s Scripture brings us back to the Golden Rule, one of the most basic and universal principles of moral thinking, one that is all-too-rarely followed. “Knock and the door will be opened to you” seems to me one of the most beautiful evocations of generosity I can imagine. We are seeking, and we are in need, and we knock, and we are invited in. I think one of the errors Americans tend to make is to think that everyone (the immigrant, the refugee) just wants to be let into our house. Maybe it’s really the opposite. What if we are the ones who are trapped outside, who need to be let in, to be let into the body of Love?

What Jesus describes is desert hospitality; it is built into the fabric of life in the Middle East. It is the generosity I felt when visiting Shakir and Nawal in their home in Bloomington. I met Shakir in graduate school at Indiana University in 1994. Having been tormented by the Persian Gulf War, which had taken place just a few years before, I was eager to talk with Shakir about his life and work. He was studying Irish literature, a fact that astounded me at the tim—not knowing the colonial and postcolonial history of Ireland and the shared legacy of the bloody British empire in both Iraq and Ireland. Shakir and his wife Nawal became friends, and Amy and I were honored to eat at Shakir and Nawal’s table (of which you’ll read more in a future installment of this Lenten observance). So when I began this Sand Opera project, I got in touch with Shakir and learned about his recent turn toward art, art-making as a sort of liberatory healing practice, to shake off the feeling of entrapment that has haunted his life ever since he left Iraq in 1991.

Shakir Mustafa is a professor of Arabic at Northeastern University. Shakir grew up in Iraq and taught at Mosul University in Northern Iraq for eleven years. He then taught at Indiana University and Boston University from 1999 to 2008. His most recent book is Contemporary Iraqi Fiction: An Anthology (Syracuse, 2008), which was recognized as “one of the most important books in 2008” by The Bloomsbury Review. His other publications are in the areas of literary translation, Irish drama, and Jewish American fiction. He has given dozens of lectures as well as radio and television interviews (NPR, NECN, FOX News among others) on Arab and Muslim cultures and politics.

If you want to email Shakir about his beautiful work, please do! It might be a gift to him to know that you’re reading his work: shakmust@gmail.com

“The Entrapment Syndrome” by Shakir Mustafa

Growing up in Iraq for me meant a gradual awakening to a sense of entrapment. A lifetime might not be long enough to get out of that entrapment, but the urge to break away almost made it bearable. Not exactly the silver lining of western cultures, but the Arabo-Islamic tradition of ultimately arriving at the good essence of what seems bad at the start. A fairly large number of what seemed bad at the start, though, stayed true to its calling, or I was never able to get to the ultimate goodness in them.

Cramped in a Russian Zil truck on our way to Al-Rasheed Camp in Baghdad, a jolly college classmate pointed to me and joked with the others, “we’ll all end up dying, and this guy here will survive.” I was the quiet one on the truck and the others were group singing some of the silliest songs that came to Iraq from neighboring Arab countries .. بید الحنة لسھ وانا ىّ يّ عل تزوج زوجي (My husband got a second wife and I haven’t been married a week yet). That sense of entrapment was so pervasive that I thought on that truck ride that I’d be the one who’d die. It was summer of 1974, and I just finished basic military training, but the word had been going around for a while that we’ll be soon rushed to intensive training to become officers. The Kurdish uprising in the north had escalated again and the army was in dire need of officers.

College graduates across Iraq still on their compulsory military service were rounded up and hurriedly trained to command equally ill-prepared units fighting a protracted insurgency. I was released from intensive training a week later when I got into the Masters program in English literature. We were doing drills under the harsh August sun when a carrier came and handed the Sargent the release order. The Sargent took his time in reading it aloud as the others were eyeing me with faint gratitude for the temporary break. I stepped out of the line to accompany the carrier, and the Sargent asked the rest of the platoon about what people do in a Masters’ program. “Masturbation,” I heard one say in English. Their voices were waning, then a few sing-sang their farewell to me, “masturbation, masturbation.”

Grad school delivered me from that entrapment then, and again in 1990 when I left Iraq to study for a doctorate at Indiana University. That second delivery, however, came to an abrupt end two months later when Saddam Hussein invaded Kuwait on August 1st. My wife and children were to fly out of Baghdad the following day, but they had to wait as the borders were shut down. That sense of entrapment proved not just potent, but much more far-reaching than anyone thought. The past twenty-five years of living in the States have been a long look into that sense of entrapment. Although my family and I have been safe and flourishing in America, Iraq has been in the news mostly through images of carnage so persistent and enduring that I wonder at times if it were indeed just one country at the receiving end of that wanton destruction. And then things start to come into better focus and one sees that a country where you have nieces and nephews, and brothers and sisters, and a small army of relatives, is something one cannot leave behind. I haven’t really felt Iraq was a country I have been carrying around, but there has always been enough of it to make it too present, and to make that presence too oppressive.

***
Translation and wood works have helped me turn some of the negative energy of entrapment into meaningful products for myself and for those around me. I haven’t escaped into them—they have been there all the time, lurking among what I love, and they just came out when I seemed to need them most. My first translations of Iraqi fiction and poetry came as a response to the trivialization of Arab culture in much of the American media after 9/11, and as a service to my students who couldn’t read Iraqi literature in Arabic. The wood works I embraced for more personal reasons.

I want to say a thing or two about wood works because they seem the more unusual interests for an academic like myself. They also seem to provide better release from the overwhelming pressures of what has been happening in Iraq after 2003. To take a piece of rough wood and make a polished art product out of it has been a counter measure to the tragic regress of much of Iraq and some Arab countries into sheer ugliness.

I have always loved wood. Wood speaks to me as I decide what to do with it. Or refuses to speak to me, and when it resists mutation, I leave it alone. The slow emergence of a finished wood object is also a record of intimate physical touches and it becomes part of my personal history. The first few pieces I did were mostly carvings as I didn’t dare to cut deeper into the wood. One of the earlier pieces was this carving of a verse of poetry in Iraqi Arabic by Mudhaffar Al-Nawwabb: بحلم تعال جیة إلك وأحسبھا Come in a dream and I’ll count that a visit.




Then I did a series of pieces that show variations on the word سلام (Peace). Some were carvings, others sculptures.






Like peace, love was also diminishing in Iraq, and the word for love, محبة   became a theme for several wood works. An alternative reality of sorts crafted from wood, and, occasionally, stones.



The horrid reality of war and carnage in Iraq also made it to a few wood pieces. One sculpture pays tribute to lives lost in meaningless sectarian or political killings that I based on a Human Rights Watch report of a head-less body identified by family members through the tattooed names of the victim’s children. Tattoos are not common in Iraq, but some started using them as means of identification in case such identification becomes necessary. In this sculpture, in African Winge wood, the names engraved on the arms and hands are random, but they are common Kurdish and Arabic names, and hence they recognize the victim somehow, a Kurd married to an Arab Mousli woman. I did this one last October around Halloween time, and the sculpture conflates the goriness of the theme with the lightness of the American holiday in both design and contents. I carved a verse from the Qur’an on the back,"نون والقلم وما يسطرون"   (Nun and the pen and what they write) and gave it the shape of a laughing face. I also inserted stones for eyes. Red and purple eyes, the kind of eyes on severed heads and Halloween masks.






That horrid reality could not continue. Not in art, at least,
and that consciousness opened up the possibilities of another type of release. One well oriented towards the medieval Arabo-Islamic and Jewish tradition of “relief after adversity,”الفرج بعد الشدة . Confronting the ills of contemporary life in Iraq and beyond started to crack, and a sense of hope set in. These glimmers of hope have already been visible in some of the “Peace” works, with a sense of harmony embodied in an animal-like figure that looks like a pet. Another piece shows two angry Nun characters—they seem shouting at each other. But when I placed them on the wall in a non-confrontational form, the anger seemed to subsided. I called the piece, “Two Nuns Shouting in the Wilderness,” and the tension was thus reduced to a bearable level.

Another piece I just finished has two figures—a parent and a child, with big smiles on their faces. The parent is on the floor holding the child up, and both seem unaware of the world around them. A moment of peace and release from pressure, and the sculpture is a rendering of the Arabic word قدم . My father used to lie down on the floor and lift us on his feet, and I did that with my children. Moments of rising above a reality too powerful to ignore, but memories of such moments are precious and enduring.

In art, I feel I was indeed the one who managed to survive, to keep his head above the water, even when the waters get thicker and murkier.







Wednesday, February 17, 2016

Sand Opera Lenten Journey Day 8: Jonah in Nineveh, plus Peter Molin and Joe Hoover, S.J.

Sand Opera Lenten Journey Day 8

Jonah 3:1-10

The word of the LORD came to Jonah a second time:
“Set out for the great city of Nineveh,
and announce to it the message that I will tell you.”
So Jonah made ready and went to Nineveh,
according to the LORD’s bidding.
Now Nineveh was an enormously large city;
it took three days to go through it.
Jonah began his journey through the city,
and had gone but a single day’s walk announcing,
“Forty days more and Nineveh shall be destroyed,”
when the people of Nineveh believed God;
they proclaimed a fast
and all of them, great and small, put on sackcloth.

Nineveh, located in northern Iraq, was a place of mythic proportions, so large it took Jonah three days to travel through. Before Jonah made it to Nineveh, of course, he avoided God’s call and literally went in the opposite direction of where he was called, which led to the whole episode inside the fish. Jonah, too, went through his own incarceration. How many cells we find ourselves in—some imposed on us, some of our own making.

Some, like Rush Limbaugh, saw what happened at Abu Ghraib as nothing more than a fraternity prank. Today, the words of Charles Graner, arguably the principal sadist of the group, lay bare the falsity of such small-minded light-heartedness. Two reflections on “The Blues of Charles Graner” take us in different directions—one from Peter Molin, an Army veteran, and one from Joe Hoover, a brother in the Society of Jesus.

The Blues of Charles Graner

The Christian in me
knows it’s wrong
but the corrections
officer in me can’t
help but love
making a man
piss himself


“The Blues of Charles Graner” by Peter Molin

Though only a junior enlisted soldier, Charles Graner, a Gulf War veteran, former Marine, and experienced corrections officer, held enormous sway within the ranks of the Army National Guardsmen assigned to Abu Ghraib, especially among the women, one of whom, Lynndie England, he impregnated and another, Megan Ambhul, whom he later married. It was Graner whom the Army held directly responsible for Abu Ghraib atrocities, his lame efforts to excuse himself on the grounds of following orders belied by the fact that he was the one directing his peers and reassuring them that abusing prisoners was OK. “The Blues of Charles Graner” consists of an artful rearrangement of callous words purportedly spoken by Graner when finally confronted by a fellow soldier. Graner probably tossed them off in jest, but they couldn’t more truly convey the sadistic impulse given vent by unfettered power.

The poem’s title reinforces the impression of Graner’s shamelessness. If Graner—who while working as a civilian corrections officer was accused of terrorizing African-American prisoners—can lay claim to the dignified authority of the blues, the proud populist artform of mid-20th-century black America, then the blues have no meaning. A monster’s victim can have the blues, but the monster can’t have the blues about that which makes him a monster.

--Peter Molin is a retired US Army infantry officer who currently teaches in the Writing Program at Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ. He blogs at Time Now: The Iraq and Afghanistan Wars in Art, Film, and Literature. www.acolytesofwar.com


Code (On “The Blues Charles Graner”) by Joe Hoover, S.J.

Code of Ethics of the American Correctional Association (founded in 1870, Ohio Governor Rutherford B. Hayes its first president):

“The ACA expects of its members unfailing honesty, respect for the dignity and individuality of human beings and a commitment to professional and compassionate service.”

And: “Members shall respect and protect the civil and legal rights of all individuals.”

And: “Members shall respect, promote and contribute to a workplace that is safe, healthy and free of harassment in any form.”

It seems, then, as if the speaker in this poem has it reversed.

It is not that Graner has ignored his Christian side and done what is wrong (make a grown man piss himself.)

Rather, it is that he has discarded his corrections officer side and failed to do what is right (follow a code and respect the dignity of a grown man.)

Graner has wrongly opposed these two states of life: Way of the Christian v. Way of the Prison Guard. When in fact you could say that, according to the code, a corrections officer behaving well looks a lot like a Christian.

But take this a step further. Even if it was his “Christian side” that did the wrong thing, is that so bad? Is that so “un-Christian?”

The Christian in me knows a lot of things are wrong and the Christian in me does them anyway. And the Christian in me who eventually confesses and repents of the wrong gets closer to God because of this. My sins can take me back to Jesus.

This is the terrible thing about the Christian faith, for all those who come into contact with Christians. Our sins are good. The awful things we do to other people can bring us back to God.    They return us to humility. They deposit us into the shock of reality--the only place God lives.

So, you could say it is the job of Christians to do wrong. Because how else can we get closer to God?

And if none of this makes sense, or even seems outrageous (humiliate a man and become a truer child of God), consider what we are reflecting on. Men, piss, prison, torture, war and a kind of hell blistering the world. None of it makes sense. The only thing that makes sense is the most senseless thing of all: that God, as they say, holds the whole blistered world in his hands as it continues to pitch and sunder. Senseless, all of it. But to whom else shall we go? You, me, Graner. To whom shall we go? To one who has the code of everlasting life.


--Joe Hoover is an actor, writer and the poetry editor at America Media. He is a Jesuit brother.

Tuesday, February 16, 2016

Sand Opera Lenten Journey Day 7: Deliver Us From (Our Own) Evil + Hayan Charara's "Animals"

Sand Opera Lenten Journey Day 7

Gospel MT 6:7-15

Jesus said to his disciples…
This is how you are to pray:

Our Father who art in heaven,
hallowed be thy name,
thy Kingdom come,
thy will be done,
on earth as it is in heaven.
Give us this day our daily bread;
and forgive us our trespasses,
as we forgive those who trespass against us;
and lead us not into temptation,
but deliver us from evil.
            --Matthew, 6:7-15


I’ve struggled with what is called “The Lord’s Prayer” or the “Our Father” even as I’ve prayed it, thousands of times, in boredom or fear, sadness or joy. I’ve thought: why “Father,” if God is beyond all human reckoning? Could we not equally say “Our Mother”? And why “in heaven” and not on earth? What of the incarnate Word, of creation as a God’s? I suppose the notion of the Kingdom on earth is supposed to allude to that. I’m on board with “daily bread,” though I’m sure the gluten-free among us would get itchy just from the sound of it. The importance of forgiveness, and the mutuality of forgiveness, seems crucial, though why we’ve translated it as “trespass” requires more explanation. Perhaps my favorite moment is the “but” in the final line; it suggests that temptation may be inevitable, and we may need delivery from evil—that we do, as much as that is done to us.

Today’s poem from Sand Opera, in the voice of one of the abused at Abu Ghraib, testifies to the problem of evil and the miracle of survival. That despite the depradations he faced, he lived. His voice, in the telling, is delivering himself from the evil that he survived. But G, the ubiquitous anti-God Charles Graner, brings “the dogs,” and the dogs are what end the poem. Dogs were one of the instruments of torture used by military police, which is doubly sad given how much comfort that a good dog can provide. Which is why I’m sharing Arab American poet Hayan Charara’s amazing poem “Animals,” from his new book Something Sinister (2016), about his own beloved animals, and the animals his brother cared for in Lebanon when Israel attacked in 2006. The animals that we become to each other.

“Animals” by Hayan Charara

The phone call, from my wife.
She’s hungry, she’s pregnant,
someone kicked her

in the stomach—we have to.
I say yes, but the reply
I keep to myself is,

We don’t have to do a goddamn thing.
A dog. I’m talking about a dog
I would have otherwise left to starve.

Now though, five years since,
I love this animal, Lucy,
more than I can most people.

            •

A boy names his dog and five cats
after our Lucy. The boy, my brother,
born in Henry Ford’s hometown,

lives now in Lebanon,
which the Greeks called Phoenicia,
and they tried but failed

to subdue it, same as the Egyptians,
Hittites, Assyrians, Babylonians,
Alexander the Great, Romans, Arabs,

Crusaders, Turks, the British,
the French, the Israelis.
There, my father built a house

with money earned in Detroit—
as a grocer, with social security.
Also there, the first alphabet

was created, the first law school built,
the first miracle of Jesus—
water, wine.

            •

On the first day
the bombs fall they flee
and the boy asks

to go back for Lucy,
the dog. As for the cats,
No. They take care of themselves.

One week into it
he wonders who feeds them,
who fills the water bowls.

Maybe the neighbors,
the mother thinks out loud.
The father is indignant: Neighbors—

what neighbors? They’re gone.
The mother is stunned:
What do you mean, gone?

After a month, everyone forgets
or just stops talking about
the animals. During the ceasefire

my father drives south,
a thirty-minute trip that lasts
six hours—wreckage upon wreckage

piled on the roads, on what is left
of the roads. The landscape
entirely gray, so catastrophic

he asks a passerby how far
to his town and is told,
You’re in it.

            •

My father finds three of the cats,
all perforated, one headless.
The dog is near the carport,

where it hid during lightning storms,
its torso splayed in half
like meat on a slab, its entrails

eaten by other dogs
scavenging on the streets.
Look. They’re animals.

Which is to say, there are also people.
And I haven’t even begun telling you
what was done to them.



Monday, February 15, 2016

Sand Opera Lenten Journey Day 6: Turning Toward the Least: The Blues of Javal Davis (+Timothy Liu)

Sand Opera Lenten Journey Day 6

“Then the righteous will answer him and say,
‘Lord, when did we see you hungry and feed you,
or thirsty and give you drink?
When did we see you a stranger and welcome you,
or naked and clothe you?
When did we see you ill or in prison, and visit you?’
And the king will say to them in reply,
‘Amen, I say to you, whatever you did
for one of these least brothers of mine, you did for me.’”
--from Matthew 25:31-46

Note:
It’s all too easy to demonize the Javal Davises, who were “just following orders” when asked to “soften up” the detainees who were purportedly enemies of America. Certainly, Davis could have refused to abuse the detainees; yet his own testimony suggests the duress that he and his cohort were under—facing constant mortar attack, and living in a haunted prison. War places us in a position where we see strangers are suspects, not proxies for Jesus. Even in civilian life, we find ways of seeing the stranger as a threat. Nowhere is this more clear on a political level than in the debates around whether we accept a place for refugees and undocumented workers in this country. But if we focus in a little closer, to the mundane occasions of our immediate life, are we turning toward or away from the “least”?



On “The Blues of Javal Davis” by Timothy Liu
So he blasted country music as a means of torture. As opposed to Death Metal. The irony in that. Country music as soundtrack (Garth Brooks, Shania Twain) when I google “Abu Ghraib” for images online. It’s a challenge. Spelling “Abu Ghraib” correctly. Imagine a gun being pointed at your head and your being commanded to spell “Abu Ghraib” correctly. Or else. Who among us would end up in one of those photos as a corpse, as a smiling torturer? Try spelling the following names correctly: Ali Shallal al-Qaisi. Manadel al-Jamadi. Ameen Saeed Al-Sheik. Saad Naif. Try pronouncing their names correctly. One of them said, “They confined us like sheep.” One of them said, “They stripped me naked. One of them told me he would rape me. He drew a picture of a woman to my back and made me stand in shameful position holding my buttocks.” One of them was designated Detainee #151362. Does it matter who got to ride Hashem Muhsen like a donkey after that naked human pyramid photo was shot? Coda: Javal Davis pled guilty on 2/5/05 to dereliction of duty, making false official statements, and battery. Sentenced to six months. Became an actor in two documentary films on the scandal after he got out.

Timothy Liu's most recent book of poems is Don't Go Back To Sleep. http://timothyliu.net 




Sunday, February 14, 2016

Sand Opera Lenten Journey Day 5: Temptations in the Desert (All of This Will Be Yours) + Tyrone Williams


Sand Opera Lenten Journey Day 5
Luke: 4:1-13

Filled with the Holy Spirit, Jesus returned from the Jordan
and was led by the Spirit into the desert for forty days,
to be tempted by the devil.
He ate nothing during those days,
and when they were over he was hungry.
The devil said to him,
“If you are the Son of God,
command this stone to become bread.”
Jesus answered him,
“It is written, 
One does not live on bread alone.”
Then he took him up and showed him
all the kingdoms of the world in a single instant.
The devil said to him,
“I shall give to you all this power and glory;
for it has been handed over to me,
and I may give it to whomever I wish.
All this will be yours, if you worship me.”
Jesus said to him in reply,
“It is written:
You shall worship the Lord, your God,
and him alone shall you serve.”
Then he led him to Jerusalem,
made him stand on the parapet of the temple, and said to him,
“If you are the Son of God,
throw yourself down from here, for it is written:
He will command his angels concerning you, to guard you,
and:
With their hands they will support you,
lest you dash your foot against a stone.”
Jesus said to him in reply,
“It also says,
You shall not put the Lord, your God, to the test.”
When the devil had finished every temptation,
he departed from him for a time.

The first recorded Christian conscientious objector was Maximilian, who in the 3rd century refused to serve in the Roman army and was beheaded for his faith. I learned about him from The Catholic Peace Tradition, by Ronald Musto, a book whose title felt slightly oxymoronic, given how many Catholics serve in the U.S. armed forces. In Luke’s cinematic story of Jesus’s temptations in the desert, the devil’s invitation to worldly power must have been particularly difficult to turn down; after all, what good could a person do, if they were in a position of great power, to change the lives of so many others? And all they would have to do is worship someone other than God.  





“After ‘The Call-Up’” by Tyrone Williams

One of the memorable, because romantic, songs from The Clash’s 1977 Sandinista! album is “The Call-Up,” a song that admonishes youth in general—from the Ukraine to the U.S.S.R., from the U.K. to the U.S.A.—to resist the call of the fathers to die in their wars: “you must not act the way you were brought up.” I like this song because in my imagination it refers not just to the theaters of war but also to the very process of induction into the normative structures and values (economic, political, social, cultural, etc.) of a given society. In others words, even before I read Althusser I was already ringing the changes on what it meant to be hailed, to be called forth. But if being called up, called forth, is a kind of initiation into human society in general, is the soldier  a sacrifice not only in terms of his or her body but also, and perhaps more important, a sacrifice in terms of what it means to be human? In other words, the soldier sacrifices everything—or almost everything—that makes one human in order to safeguard other humans. In short, the decision to circumvent the Geneva Convention in the context of “new” wars (e.g., the ‘war” on terror) means no-holds-barred.

Philip Metres’ Sand Opera raises this issue in general, and the “abu ghraib arias” section explicitly explores it, delineates it in a series of dialectical poems: the verso pages contain poems in the voices of Arab, Afghan and Muslim prisoners while the recto pages contain poems in the voices of U.S.A. soldiers. The dialectics that this sequence sets in motion cannot be simply reduced to innocent testimonials and guilt-ridden confessions. Rather, innocence and guilt haunt the voices of both prisoners and soldiers; both find themselves reduced to shame.

One pairing that I find particularly poignant is “(echo/ex/),” a general title for all the prisoner poems, and “The Blues of Javal Davis.” The prisoner has been reduced not to an ‘animal” or even a plant but, rather, to the first particle of Judaic/Christian creation: “In the beginning                    I was there for 67 days of” (8). I can’t reproduce here Metres’s use of black bars and gray shading to indicate degrees of redacted texts (like FBI files) but they work in concert to indicate broken, incomplete voices; these men will never be the way they were before Guantanamo. At the same time, Javal Davis “testifies” to his own sense of imprisonment: “much on our own working/ seven days straight ducked/ heads when mortars fell/ slept seven to a cell” (9) As the references to the seven days of creation suggest, these are boys in the process of being made into soldiers. Of course, there is no moral, much less military, equivalence between the prisoners of war and the bunkered soldiers. However, in exploring the psychodynamics of both Metres points to, by implication, the larger forces, the “gods” and/or “fathers,” whose deliberate choices set in action the violent encounters between these boys.
  

Born in Detroit, Poet Tyrone Williams is the author of a number of books and chapbooks, including c.c. (2002), On Spec (2008), The Hero Project (2009), Adventures of Pi (2011), and Howell (2011). He teaches at Xavier University in Cincinnati. 

Saturday, February 13, 2016

Sand Opera Lenten Journey Day 4

Sand Opera Lenten Journey Day 4

Isaiah 58

Thus says the LORD:
If you remove from your midst oppression,
false accusation and malicious speech;
If you bestow your bread on the hungry
and satisfy the afflicted;
Then light shall rise for you in the darkness,
and the gloom shall become for you like midday…


(echo/ex)
from SAND OPERA


Note:
As I re-read this poem today, I’m reminded of the dual difficulty it presents: that of telling traumatic stories, and of listening to them. The Iraqi who testified to what happened says that he had nothing to gain materially from telling this story, and that he wasn’t even supposed to tell it, but he tells it anyway, even as it returns him to the experience of total humiliation. His voice is difficult to hear because to hear it means that we enter into his experience of suffocating debasement. It also necessitates that we recognize that those who did this to him were Americans. In some strange way, we are the indirect authors of his pain. In today’s readings, Isaiah exhorts us to remove oppression from our midst, but the layers that separate us from this man are so manifold, so visibly invisible, it is difficult to know precisely how.

Two simple ways to begin this process of conscientization. One way is to remember, to remember something that has not been included our collective memory, but nonetheless involves us. For example, today is the twenty-fifth anniversary of the Al Amiriyah Attack, in which 400 Iraqi civilians (mostly women and children) in a Baghdad bomb shelter were killed by U.S. missile attacks during the Persian Gulf War. Dima Yassine was ten minutes from the bombing, and could smell the burned flesh for days afterward. http://www.jadaliyya.com/pages/index/23839/resisting-amnesia_twenty-five-years-after-the-al-a

What would it mean to remember Al Amiriyah—or The Move bombing in Philadelphia, for example—as clearly as the San Bernadino attacks or even 9/11?

The second way, specifically related to the content of this poem, is to scrutinize current U.S. policy regarding interrogation. My colleague, the ethicist Paul Lauritzen, wrote a deeply thoughtful examination of U.S. policies of interrogation, particularly the Bush Administration’s employment of the Orwellian-sounding “enhanced interrogation.” In The Ethics of Interrogation, Lauritzen attempts to create a moral framework to guide U.S. interrogation policy, differentiating between coercive interrogation (which he believes is legal and moral) and abusive interrogation. The key, for him, regards the question of whether interrogation acknowledges and maintains the dignity of the one under interrogation. One might hasten to add, with Isaiah in mind, the interrogator’s own potential loss of dignity.


Here it is useful to be concrete. Suppose we turn to the techniques set out in Army Field Manual 34-52, the 1992 Army document that spells out guidelines for “intelligence interrogation” and to the ten enhanced interrogation techniques that the classified Bybee memorandum addressed in August 2002. How should these various techniques be classified?  We can begin with FM 34-52. The manual covers interrogation in great detail, with chapters on everything from the general mission of military intelligence units and the structure of such units to the handling of documents produced through intelligence operations, including interrogation. Chapter three of the manual covers the actual techniques of interrogation. It identifies roughly a dozen general interrogation strategies, with some variations within each category. The categories are: direct, incentive, emotional, fear, pride and ego, futility, we know all, file and dossier, establish your identity, repetition, rapid fire, silence, and change of scene.

The coercive nature of all interrogation can be seen in the fact that even in the most innocuous of these techniques, namely, a direct approach in which the interrogator simply asks for the information he wants, the subject being interrogated is powerless and vulnerable. The detainee does not necessarily know where he is; he does not know what will happen if he refuses to answer; and even if he answers questions truthfully, he may not be believed. Nevertheless, not all techniques are the same. Asking a detainee a direct question is very different from what the manual refers to as a “Fear-Up (Harsh)” approach. According to the manual, “in this [Fear-Up (Harsh)] approach, the interrogator behaves in an overpowering manner with a loud and threatening voice. The interrogator may even feel the need to throw objects across the room to heighten the source’s implanted feelings of fear . . . This technique is to convince the source he does indeed have something to fear; that he has no option but to cooperate.”

The fact that questioning a detainee is coercive and may be harsh, however, does not mean it is morally or legally prohibited. Indeed, all the techniques set out in FM 34-52 are approved by the military, in part because they do not violate Geneva Conventions or the Uniform Code of Military Justice. The Preface to the manual is clear about the necessity of restraint. “These principles and techniques of interrogation,” the manual reads, “are to be used within the constraints established by the following”:
·       The Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ)
·       Geneva Convention for the Amelioration of the Wounded and Sick in Armed Forces in the Field of August 12, 1949, hereinafter referred to as GWS
·       Geneva Convention Relative to the Treatment of Prisoners of War of August 12, 1949, hereinafter referred to as GPW
·       Geneva Convention Relative to the Protection of Civilian Persons in Time of War of August 12, 1949, hereinafter referred to as GC.

Article three, which is common to all three of these Conventions, provides an indication of the basis upon which interrogations are to be judged. It reads:
(1)   Persons taking no active part in the hostilities, including members of armed forces who have laid down their arms and those placed 'hors de combat' by sickness, wounds, detention, or any other cause, shall in all circumstances be treated humanely, without any adverse distinction founded on race, colour, religion or faith, sex, birth or wealth, or any other similar criteria. To this end, the following acts are and shall remain prohibited at any time and in any place whatsoever with respect to the above-mentioned persons: (a) violence to life and person, in particular murder of all kinds, mutilation, cruel treatment and torture; (b) taking of hostages; (c) outrages upon personal dignity, in particular humiliating and degrading treatment; (d) the passing of sentences and the carrying out of executions without previous judgment pronounced by a regularly constituted court, affording all the judicial guarantees which are recognized as indispensable by civilized peoples.
From this and other articles in the conventions, it is clear that the standard that is to guide the treatment of prisoners is one that safeguards the dignity and humanity of prisoners. Prisoners should not be degraded; they should not be treated cruelly; and they should not be physically or emotionally abused.


--Paul Lauritzen is Professor of Religious Ethics at John Carroll University in Cleveland. He is the author or editor of 5 books, including The Ethics of Interrogation (2013), and has published extensively on issues in bioethics, human rights, and religious ethics. He is the past coeditor of the Journal of the Society of Christian Ethics and is currently an associate editor with the Journal of Religious Ethics.

Friday, February 12, 2016

Sand Opera Lenten Journey Day Three

Sand Opera Lenten Journey: Day Three

Thus says the Lord GOD:
Cry out full-throated and unsparingly,
lift up your voice like a trumpet blast…
This, rather, is the fasting that I wish:
releasing those bound unjustly,
untying the thongs of the yoke;
Setting free the oppressed,
breaking every yoke;
Sharing your bread with the hungry,
sheltering the oppressed and the homeless;
Clothing the naked when you see them,
and not turning your back on your own.
Then your light shall break forth like the dawn,
and your wound shall quickly be healed….
            --Isaiah

The Hebrew prophet Isaiah, one of my favorite prophets, invites us to think of fasting as questing for justice, mercy and love. I've always had a hard time with fasting from food, partly due to health reasons, so I'm drawn to Isaiah's idea that "fasting" can take on other dimensions. Not just self-abnegation, but care for the common self, the common good. To break the bonds of those held captive unjustly, to free the oppressed, to break bread with those without bread, to shelter the homeless, the refugee. How can we break forth our light like the dawn?

(Every few days, I’ll try to offer some a “call to action,” but I welcome your input.)

Today begins the first poem from “abu ghraib arias,” a sequence of poems in Sand Opera that explores the 2004 Abu Ghraib prison scandal, in which it was discovered that U.S. military police had been engaged in abuse and torture of Iraqi detainees, and then documenting it in photographs and film. I won’t link to those pictures, because to do so would be to continue that trauma. What happened there is why I wrote Sand Opera. Words were my way in, into the heart of that moral darkness of the War on Terror.

These poems are a dialogue between Standard Operation Procedure for Camp Delta in Guantanamo Bay, the soldiers who served in Abu Ghraib, and the Abu Ghraib prisoners. I draw upon a number of sources: a Standard Operating Procedure manual for Camp Echo at the Guantanamo Bay prison camp (thanks to WikiLeaks); the testimony of Abu Ghraib torture victims found in Mark Danner’s Torture and Truth: America and the War on Terror; the words of U.S. soldiers and contractors as found in Philip Gourevitch and Errol Morris’s The Ballad of Abu Ghraib; the official reports on the Abu Ghraib prison scandal (the Taguba Report, the Schlesinger Report, etc.); interviews with Joe Darby and Eric Fair (two whistle-blowers); the Bible; and the Code of Hammurabi. 


The Blues of Lane McCotter

four Iraqis at the gate
all of them missing
their hands or their
█████████story

under Saddam their arms
██████ had been
██████████said
they knew they were

buried on the grounds
they wanted to uncover
those bones for proper
█████████████

four Iraqis ███████
I could not grant
access on account
█████████████

█████████████
███████one could enter 
████start taking pictures
██████████████

they removed their hands
█████████████
██████ I watched as night
took the rest of them

“The Blues of Lane McCotter” by Peter Molin

Lane McCotter occupies a strange pride-of-place very near the beginning of Sand Opera.  Barely noted in his time or remembered now, McCotter was the Coalition Provisional Authority official charged with standing up a prison system resourced and administered by Americans after they occupied Iraq in 2003. McCotter’s plans were submitted and he was out of the country before the first prisoners were housed in Abu Ghraib, and by accounts McCotter agitated for professionally or even progressively run penal institutions, to include new facilities and a competently supervised Iraqi staff. But McCotter’s recommendations were vetoed and undercut by higher authorities, decisions that led to the makeshift use of Abu Ghraib, a hated symbol of Saddam Hussein’s reign of terror, as a CPA prison and the ad hoc deployment of poorly trained and motivated National Guardsmen to serve as guards. 

So what blues does Lane McCotter sing? Grief that his good work and name were besmirched by the travesty of events that unfolded in his wake? A lament that he was unable to press hard enough to see his plans and vision implemented? The knowledge of ultimate culpability that comes with having been at one time in charge? The guilt of banal bureaucratic participation in evil? One of Metres’ epigraphs, taken from Michael Herr’s Dispatches, would seem to especially apply here:

“…it took the war to teach it, that you were responsible for everything you saw as you were for everything you did.  The problem was that you didn’t always know what you were seeing until later, maybe years later, that a lot never made it in at all, it just stayed there in your eyes….”

“The Blues of Lane McCotter” offers first view of one of Metres’s stylistic signatures in Sand Opera:  the repurposing of passages taken from memoirs and official documents, with blacked-out redactions added by Metres, as poetry to convey the ethical, material, psychological, and social horror of Abu Ghraib events.  The blacked out portions of text compel readers to fill in blanks and make connections as they will, thus drawing readers into the complicated, constricted, and ambiguous smear of implications faced by the Abu Ghraib actors themselves. “The Blues of Lane McCotter” recounts an anecdote related by McCotter in which he remembers denying entrance to a prison under his control to four Iraqis who want to recover severed hands or other body parts suffered during incarceration under Saddam. The speaking voice cannot allow the Iraqis access on security grounds, but the memory, or the image, as Herr has it, of being unable to help lingers. Early on, the anecdote implies, justice and good intentions were fudged, and the new boss remembers himself at the head of a long train of events that would eventually mirror the inhumanity of the old boss. By foregrounding McCotter’s somewhat remote connection to the abuses and humiliations that would follow, Sand Opera asks us to consider the responsibility all Americans bear for Abu Ghraib and to think what we might have done if we were in his place.


--Peter Molin is a retired US Army infantry officer who currently teaches in the Writing Program at Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ.  He blogs at Time Now: The Iraq and Afghanistan Wars in Art, Film, and Literature. www.acolytesofwar.com