Saturday, July 14, 2007

Bob Perelman's "Shock and Awe" and Dick Cheney's Mind/"Wichita Vortex Sutra" for the 21st century




I've been a fan of Bob Perelman's poetry for about a decade, ever since Mike Magee introduced me to the work of his mentor at UPenn. Perelman is one of those rare poets whose crossover appeal has three dimensions--he's a witty experimental writer who is bawdy and grounded, he's a lyrical dynamo with intellectual rigor, and he's a fine, plainspoken critic who doesn't need to impress with theoretically-leaden prose. Perelman's poem, "Against Shock and Awe," written in 2003, hearkens back to Allen Ginsberg's great Vietnam War poem, "Wichita Vortex Sutra." Although it doesn't have the fragmented oral quality of Ginsberg's epic, Perelman's "Against Shock and Awe" situates its meditation on the war through imagining Cheney's "Wyoming," as Ginsberg does with "Wichita." Perelman had this poem published in the Philadelphia Inquirer, as well as on counterpunch--demonstrating the crucial need for a kind of public role for poetry, and to resist war.

"Against Shock and Awe" by Bob Perelman

For Kerry Sherin

We may not have chosen to live inside Dick Cheney's mind, but we
do.

Wyoming, I read somewhere, is the safest place in North America.

No tornados, no tsunamis, no earthquakes, no monsoons, or
floods. No major airport: no big planes crashing in the sleet.

But if living in Wyoming is so safe, living inside Dick Cheney's mind,
though it was formed there, is not safe at all.

How do you get from Wyoming to Shock and Awe?

Getting from Love to Hate, that's easy: Love, Live, Give, Gave,
Gate, Hate.

Love comes before life, and since newborns don't survive on their
own, life at the beginning involves giving. It has to: breast milk,
protection, language, diapers made out of whatever, some sort of
attention before you crawl or walk. Everyone living was given
some of that somehow.

That gets us up to Give. Gave comes next because giving is tiring.
You give and give and what thanks do you get? Nothing. Or
worse. They think they're entitled; they're madder than ever; they
sulk in their rooms, they throw rocks.

So much for giving. The next logical step is to build a gate.

But gates creak at night, they leak, they break, in fact, gates
concentrate whatever's on either side, they distill hate.

Love, Live, Give, Gave, Gate, Hate: Q.E.D.

But getting from Wyoming to Shock and Awe?

"Shock and Awe"? That's the Pentagon's current battle plan for
Iraq: 300 to 400 cruise missiles the first day (more than in all of
Desert Storm), 300 to 400 the next, to demolish water, electricity,
communications, buildings, roads, bridges, infrastructure in
general. "The sheer size of this has never been seen before," a
Pentagon official told CBS. "There will not be a safe place in
Baghdad." Harlan Ullman drew a parallel to Hiroshima: the Iraqi
people will be "physically, emotionally and psychologically
exhausted"; it will be "like the nuclear weapons at Hiroshima, not
taking days or weeks but minutes." The point is "to impose
overwhelming level of Shock and Awe, to seize control of the
environment and paralyze or so overload an adversary's
perceptions and understanding of events that the enemy would
be incapable of resistance."

This is Shock and Awe, remember, not Wyoming.

But it gets hard to tell them apart: overwhelming levels seizing
control, paralyzing perceptions and understanding.

That works for Wyoming and just about anywhere in the United
States.

That's the problem with living inside Dick Cheney's mind, whether
we've chosen to or not.

What's the point of Shock and Awe?

To free the Iraqi people.

Problem: "No safe place in Baghdad" contradicts "To free the Iraqi
people."

Rationale: Since the Iraqi people are enslaved inside Saddam
Hussein's mind, that mind must be destroyed. That means
destroying Saddam Hussein's body, which means brushing aside
Baghdad to find him to free the Iraqi people trapped inside his
mind.

But dead people are free only in the most limited way. Not much
bang for the buck there.

Deeper rationale: It's an adult world. Shock and Awe is adult
political theater for a world audience. To reach an audience that
big you have to project. That's the point of Shock, the sheer size
of which has never, etc. Otherwise the audience won't be struck
with Awe.

What's the point of Awe?

Awe kills two birds with one stone. For the right Arabs, it
inaugurates democracy, or something, somehow. For the wrong
Arabs, Awe will . . . what? Awe will awe them into submission.

I can hear Dick Cheney arguing that Awe worked at Hiroshima.

But Japan was at war with us, and Awe, or at least Instant
Submission, didn't work outside Japan. The Iraqi people are not
only not at war with us, we're rescuing them from Saddam
Hussein's mind. And as for working outside Baghdad? Destroying
it will awe al-Qaeda? That's a stretch. There are more al-Qaedans
in London or Berlin than in Baghdad. Maybe we should get Berlin
first.

No matter how big you make Shock, you can't get to Awe.

Forget it: We'll never know the exact route from Wyoming to
Shock and Awe.

But Shock and Awe is already halfway here: Here, Baghdad and
Here, Wyoming. We're half "physically, emotionally and
psychologically exhausted"; our "perceptions and understanding"
are half "overloaded."

But even half a mind is enough to do the math: We're half capable
of resistance.

The shocks are gigantic, disgusting, but at least they're not
shocking, once we give up our imaginary safety.

The other half, Awe with its ersatz religious capital letter, we can
resist.

The weapons are huge and thoughtless, but they don't deserve a shred of awe.

A small victory, but it's one weapon destroyed, the one they
always use first.



Bob Perelman is a poet and a professor of English at the University of Pennsylvania. The Shock and Awe language comes from Web sites found on Google under "Shock and Awe." He can be reached at: perelman@english.upenn.edu

Friday, July 13, 2007

Poets Against the War reading in Iowa from November 2005

Another gift of blogging is the daily opportunity not only to engage a subject--in this case, the ongoing interactions between poetry and the peace movement--but also to discover resources that I have missed, to devote a small chunk of my day to keeping up to date. In recognition of the publication of Behind the Lines, The University of Iowa's "Virtual Writing University" posted their audio of the Iowa Poets Against the War reading from 2005. Among the poets: Marvin Bell, Kiki Petrosino, David Hamilton, John Mateer, James Galvin, James McKean, Dave Morice, Mani Rao, Mary Swander, Mary Ruefle, Jan Weissmiller, and Dean Young. Only Marvin Bell gets a brief mention in my book, so I look forward in a future post to comment on this reading and explore these poets.

Listen to the audio of the Iowa Writer's Workshop's "Poets Against the War" reading from 2005.

Here's the breakdown:

Marvin Bell reads the following poems: "I Didn't Sleep;" "A Lesson from the Core;" and "Hard Times for Army Recruiters."

James Galvin reads the following poems: "Nike;" and "What Do You Want To Be When You Grow Up."

David Hamilton reads two poems by Margaret Gibson: "Fuel;"and "Moment." He reads an excerpt from the August, 1804 journal of Lewis and Clark, then reads a poem of his own, "Someone."

John Mateer reads the following poems: "The Bombing;"and "One Year."

James McKean reads an excerpt of Robert Lowell's "Near the Ocean," and a poem of his own, "Policy." He reads the last stanza of W.H. Auden's poem "September 1, 1939."

Dave Morice sings "Deep in the Heart of Bagdhad."

Mani Rao performs two songs. The first song is untitled, but the first line is "Protect me from myself." The second song is titled "Bush."

Mary Ruefle reads a poems that begins with the line, "War engenders violence." She reads John Berryman's "Snowline," and Gerard Manley Hopkins' "Binsey Poplars," and Walt Whitman's "Look Down, Fair Moon."

Mary Swander reads from her book, Crazy Eddy on the Judgement Day.

Jan Weissmiller reads "Eye on Apocalypse;" and "Tribute." She reads Emily Dickinson's "My Life Had Stood - a Loaded Gun."

Dean Young reads "Primitive Mentor." He reads the last stanza of Kenneth Koch's "The Pleasures of Peace."

Thursday, July 12, 2007

Hayan Charara's "Usage"



When I attended this year's RAWI (Radius of Arab American Writers) Conference in Dearborn, I felt somehow that I finally found my literary brothers and sisters. All versed in the poetics of hummus and zaatar, of pride and shame, they pushed and are pushing beyond the cliches of identity politics. One of them, Hayan Charara, is completing an anthology called Inclined to Speak: Contemporary Arab American Poetry. His recent "Usage," which appears in the recent issue of Literary Imagination, is a stark poem that employs grammatical rules to explore the inner and outer grammars of Arab immigrant and second generation existence in America in the wake of September 11, 2001. (In the original, certain words are highlighted, to demonstrate the rule.)

Usage

An assumption, a pejorative, an honest language, an honorable
death. In grade school, I refused to accept the mayor’s
handshake; he smiled at everyone except people with names
like mine. I was born here. I didn’t have to adopt America,
but I adapted to it. You understand: a man must be averse
to opinions that have adverse impacts on whether he lives
or dies. “Before taking any advice, know the language
of those who seek to advise you.” Certain words affected
me. Sand nigger, I was called. Camel jockey. What was
the effect? While I already muttered under my breath,
I did so even more. I am not altogether sure we can all
together come. Everything was not all right. Everything
is not all right. Imagine poetry without allusions to
Shakespeare, Greek mythology, the Bible; or allusions
without the adjectives “fanatical,” “extremist,” “Islamic,”
“right,” “left,” “Christian,” “conservative,” “liberal.” /
Language written or translated into a single tongue gives
the illusion of tradition. A lot of people murder language–
a lot fully aware. Among all the dead, choose between
“us” and “them.” Among all the names for the dead–
mother, father, brother, sister, husband, wife, child, friend,
colleague, neighbor, teacher, student, stranger–choose
between “citizen” and “terrorist.” / And poet? Immoral,
yes, but never amoral? Large amounts, the number
between 75 and 90 percent of the estimated 150 million
to 1 billion–civilians–killed during wars, over all of recorded
human history. Anxious is “worried” or “apprehensive.” /
American poetry, Americans. Young, I learned anyone
born here could become President. Older, I can point to
any one of a hundred reasons why this is a lie. Anyway,
I don’t want to be President, not of a country, or club, not
here or there, not anywhere. He said, “I turned the car
around because it began raining bombs.” There’s no chance
of ambiguity–an as here could mean “because” or “when”;
it makes no difference–he saw the sky, felt the ground,
knew what would come next; it matters little when the heart
rate jumps from 70 to 200 beats per minute in less than
a second. What they did to my grandfather was awful–
its wretchedness, awe-inspiring; its cruelty, terrible; it was
awfully hard to forget. Just after 8:46AM, I wondered awhile
what would happen next. At 9:03AM, I knew there was going
to be trouble for a while to come. When in her grief,
the woman said, “We’re going to hurt them bad,” she meant
to say, “We’re going to hurt them badly.” For seventeen days,
during air strikes, my grandfather slept on a cot beside a kerosene
lamp in the basement of his house. Besides a few days worth
of pills, and a gallon of water, he had nothing else to eat
or drink. Given these conditions, none of us were surprised
that on the eighteenth day, he died. / Besides, he was
eight-two years old. I can write what I please. I don’t need
to ask, May I? Like a song: Men with capital meet in
the Capitol in the nation’s capital. Any disagreements,
censored; those making them–poets, dissenters, activists–,
censured. The aftermath, approximately 655,000 people killed. /
“The Human Cost of War in Iraq: A Mortality Study, 2002-2006,”
Bloomsburg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University
(Baltimore, Maryland); School of Medicine, Al Mustansiriya
University (Baghdad, Iraq); in cooperation with the Center
for International Studies, Massachusetts Institute of Technology
(Cambridge, Massachusetts). The figure just cited–655,000
dead–resulted from a household survey conducted at actual sites,
in Iraq, not the Pentagon, or White House, or a newsroom,
or someone’s imagination. Of course, language has been
corrupted. Look, the President, who speaks coarsely, says,
“We must stay the course.” The problem with “Let your
conscience be your guide” is you must first be aware, conscious,
of the fact that a moral principle is a subjective thing. I wonder:
when one “smokes ‘em out of a hole,” if the person doing
the smoking is conscious of his conscience at work. / Am I
fully conscious of how I arrived at this? The continual
dissemination of similar images and ideas. / The continual
aired footage of planes striking the towers, the towers
crumbling to the streets, dust, screams, a continuous reel
of destruction, fear, as if the attacks were happening twenty-four
hours a day, every day, any time. For a while, I couldn’t
care less about war. / Then I saw corpses, of boys, who
looked just like me. This was 1982, at age ten. Ever since,
I couldn’t care less why anyone would want it. In 1982,
any one of those boys could have been me. Now, it’s any one
of those dead men could be me. The Secretary of State
offered such counsel to the ambassadors of the world that
the United Nations Security Council nodded in favor of war.
Criterion easily becomes criteria. Even easier: to no longer
require either. The data turned out false. / The doctrine
of preemption ultimately negated its need. While we both
speak English, our languages are so different from each other,
yours might as well be Greek to me. When the black man
in the park asked, “Are you Mexican, Puerto Rican, or are you
Pakistani?” and I said, “I’m Arab,” and he replied, “Damn.
Someone don’t like you very much,” I understood perfectly
what he meant. The President alluded to the Crusades because
(not due to) a lack of knowledge. / Later, he retracted the statement,
worried it might offend the Middle East; it never occurred
the offense taken was due to the bombs shredding them
to bits and pieces. “You are either with us or with the terrorists”
(September 20, 2001). “You’re either with us or against us”
(November 6, 2001). The day after, the disc jockey
advocated, on air, a thirty-three cent solution (the cost of a bullet)
to the problem of terrorists in our midst–he meant in New York;
also, by terrorists, I wonder, did he know he meant cab drivers,
hot dog vendors, students, bankers, neighbors, passers-by,
New Yorkers, Americans; did he know he also meant Sikhs,
Hindus, Iranians, Africans, Asians; did he know, too,
he meant Christians, Jews, Buddhists, Atheists; did he realize
he was eliciting a violent response, on the radio, in the afternoon? /
Among those who did not find the remark at all illicit:
the owners of the radio station, the FCC, the mayor, the governor,
members of the House, the Senate, the President of the United States. Emigrate is better than immigrate. Proof: No such thing as
illegal emigration. Further proof: Emigration is never
an election issue. I heard enthusiastic speeches. They hate
our freedoms, our way of life, our this, that, and the other,
and so on (not etc.). Not everyone agreed every one not
“with us” was “against us.” Detroit was farther from home
than my father ever imagined. / He convinced himself soon after
arriving here he had ventured further than he should have.
Fewer people live in his hometown than when he left, in 1966.
The number, even less, following thirty-four straight days
of aerial bombardment. First (not firstly), my father spoke
Arabic; second (not secondly) he spoke broken English, third
(not thirdly) he spoke Arabic at home and English at work; fourth
(not fourthly) he refused to speak English anymore. Not every
poem is good. Not every poem does well. Not every poem is well,
either. Nor does every poem do good. “To grow the economy”
is more than jargon. / Can a democracy grow without violence?
Ours didn’t. / They still plan to grow tomatoes this year, despite
what was done. Several men, civilian workers, identified
as enemies, were hanged on a bridge, bodies torched, corpses
swaying in the breeze. / Photographs of the dead were hung
with care. I can hardly describe what is going on. Day after day,
he told himself, “I am an American. I eat apple pie. I watch baseball.
I read American poetry. I speak American English. I was born
in Detroit, a city as American as it gets. I vote. I work. I pay taxes,
too many taxes. I own a car. I make mortgage payments. I am not
hungry. I worry less than the rest of the world. I could stand to lose
a few pounds. I eat several types of cuisine on a regular basis.
I flush toilets. I let the faucet drip. I have central air-conditioning.
I will never starve to death or experience famine. I will never die
of malaria. I can say whatever the fuck I please.” Even words
succumbed; hopefully turned into a kind of joke; hopeful, a slur.
However, I use the words, but less, with more care. The President
implied compassion; but inferred otherwise. This is not
meant to be ingenious. Nor is it ingenuous. The more
he got into it, the more he saw poetry, like language, was in
a constant state of becoming. Regardless, or because of this,
he welcomed the misuse of language. Language is its own
worst enemy–it’s the snake devouring its own tail. They
thought of us not kind of or sort of but as somewhat American.
Lie: “To recline or rest on a surface?” No. “To put or place
something?” No. Depleted uranium, heavy like lead; its use–
uranium shells–led to birth defects. When in his anger,
the man said, “We’re going to teach them a lesson,” I wonder
what he thought they would learn. In a war, a soldier is
less likely to die than a civilian. He looks like he hates
our freedoms. / You don’t know them like I do. / He looks as if
he hates our freedoms. / You don’t know them as I do.
When in his sorrow, my father said, “Everybody loose in war,”
I knew exactly what he meant. It may be poets should
fight wars. Maybe then, metaphors–not bodies, not hillsides,
not hospitals, not schools–will explode. I might have
watched the popular sitcom if not for my family¬–they were
under attack, they might have died. / Others may have been
laughing at jokes while bodies were being torn apart.
I could not risk that kind of laughter. Of all the media
covering war, which medium best abolishes the truth?
I deceive myself. / I will deceive you myself. In the Bronx,
I passed as Puerto Rican. I passed as Greek in Queens,
also Brazilian, Pakistani, Bangladeshi, even a famous,
good-looking American movie actor. As Iranian in Manhattan.
At the mall in New Jersey, the sales clerk guessed Italian.
Where Henry Ford was born, my hometown, I always pass
as Arab. / I may look like the men in the great paintings
of the Near East, but their lives, their ways, I assure you,
are in the past. Plus, except in those paintings, or at the movies,
I never saw Arabs with multiple wives, or who rode camels,
lived in silk tents, drank from desert wells; moreover, it’s time
to move past that. Did language precede violence? / Can
violence proceed without language? It broke my father’s heart
to talk about the principle of equal justice. The news aired
several quotations from the airline passengers, one of whom was
a middle-aged man with children, who said, “I didn’t feel
safe with them on board.” He used the word “them” though
only one, an Arab, was on the plane. Being from Detroit,
I couldn’t help but think of Rosa Parks. Then I got angry.
I said to the TV, to no one in particular, “If you don’t feel safe,
then you get off the goddamn plane.” / You can quote me
on that. I was really angry¬–not real angry, but really angry.
The reason? A poet asked me why I didn’t write poems
about Muslim and Arab violence against others, and I said I did,
and then he said he meant violence against Americans and Israelis,
respectively, and I said I did, and before I could go on, he interrupted
to ask why I didn’t write poems about mothers who sent
their sons and daughters on suicide missions. As if, as if, as if.
I respectfully decline to answer any more questions. / Write
your own goddamn poem! Does this poem gratify the physical
senses? Does it use sensuous language? It certainly does not
attempt to gratify those senses associated with sexual pleasure.
In this way, it may not be a sensual poem. However, men have
been known to experience sexual gratification in situations
involving power, especially over women, other men, life, and
language. My father said, “No matter how angry they make you,
invite the agents in the house, offer them coffee, be polite.
If they stay long, ask them to sit. Otherwise, they will try to set
you straight.” When in his frustration, he said, “Should of,
could of, would of,” he meant, “Stop, leave me alone, I refuse
to examine the problem further.” Because (not since) the terrorists
attacked us, we became more like the rest of the world than
ever before. This is supposed to be a poem; it is supposed to
be in a conversation with you. Be sure and participate.
“No language is more violent than another,” he said. Then
he laughed, and said, “Except the one you use.” Do conflicts
of interest exist when governments award wartime contracts
to companies that have close ties to government officials?
From 1995 to 2000, Dick Cheney, Vice President of the United States,
was CEO of Halliburton, which is headquartered in Houston,
Texas, near Bush International Airport. Would they benefit
themselves by declaring war? Please send those men back home.
My grandfather lay there unconscious. For days, there was
no water, no medicine, nothing to eat. The soldiers left their
footprints at the doorstep. / His sons and daughters, they’re now
grieving him. “Try not to make too much of it” was the advice
given after two Homeland Security agents visited my house,
not once, not twice, but three times. I’m waiting for my right
mind. The language is a long ways from here. After
the bombs fell, I called every night to find out whether my father
was alive or dead. He always asked, “How’s the weather there?”
Soon enough, he assured me, things would return to normal,
that (not where) a ceasefire was on the way. Although
(not while) I spoke English with my father, he replied in Arabic.
Then I wondered, who’s to decide whose language it is anyway–
you, me? your mother, father, books, perspective, sky, earth,
ground, dirt, dearly departed, customs, energy, sadness, fear,
spirit, poetry, God, dog, cat, sister, brother, daughter, family,
you, poems, nights, thoughts, secrets, habits, lines, grievances,
breaks, memories, nightmares, mornings, faith, desire, sex,
funerals, metaphors, histories, names, tongues, syntax, coffee,
smoke, eyes, addiction, witness, paper, fingers, skin, you, your,
you’re here, there, the sky, the rain, the past, sleep, rest, live, stop,
go, breathe.

Wednesday, July 11, 2007

Dunya Mikhail




Dunya Mikhail, the Iraqi poet with whom I participated in the CHF panel, demonstrated her considerable humility by reading only two poems and telling a short anecdote, while the rest of us blathered on. So, today, I dedicate to her. This is her devastating poem, "Bag of Bones," one of the first poems from The War Works Hard. You can hear her interview at npr.

"Bag of Bones" by Dunya Mikhail

What good luck!
She has found his bones.
The skull is also in the bag
the bag in her hand
like all other bags
in all other trembling hands.
His bones, like thousands of bones
in the mass graveyard,
his skull, not like any other skull.
Two eyes or holes
with which he listened to music
that told his own story,
a nose
that never knew clean air,
a mouth, open like a chasm,
was not like that when he kissed her
there, quietly,
not in this place
noisy with skulls and bones and dust
dug up with questions:
What does it mean to die all this death
in a place where the darkness plays all this silence?
What does it mean to meet your loved ones now
with all of these hollow places?
To give back to your mother
on the occasion of death
a handful of bones
she had given to you
on the occasion of birth?
To depart without death or birth certificates
because the dictator does not give receipts
when he takes your life?
The dictator has a heart, too,
a balloon that never pops.
He has a skull, too, a huge one
not like any other skull.
It solved by itself a math problem
That multiplied the one death by millions
to equal homeland
The dictator is the director of a great tragedy.
He has an audience, too,
an audience that claps
until the bones begin to rattle—
the bones in bags,
the full bag finally in her hand,
unlike her disappointed neighbor
who has not yet found her own.

Tuesday, July 10, 2007

Poems of Peace, Poems of War/Chicago Humanities Festival 2006

In November, 2006, as part of the Chicago Humanities Festival, we put together a panel of poets to discuss and read poems of peace and war. The Poetry Foundation was a principal sponsor, and secured a review of the event, as well as posting the audio. I am a real fan of Emily Warn's work with the Poetry Foundation online, her work with Voices in Wartime, and her partisanship for a poetry beyond quietude and insularity. Yet I disliked the reviewer's framing of the event, so I wrote a rebuttal which I will include here.

Regarding the particular likes and dislikes of Mr. Doerksen’s so bitingly expressed here, I’ll resort to the Latin: “de gustibus non est disputandum.” However, I do wish to point out that the review, in its neglect of the title, format, and background of the event, courts the kind of reflexive dismissal and belittlement that so characterizes dominant discourse about war, war resistance and what I’ll call “the beyond of war”—peace.

First, this event was called “Poems of Peace and War,” not “War Poetry.” The review seems to suggest that this event was about war poetry alone. Most of the panelists worked to complicate that notion, telling stories, made statements and read works that navigated from war to peace; Dunya Mikhail, for instance, read not only “The War Works Hard,” a blisteringly ironic poem that personifies war, but also a love poem that cleverly marries the language of geometry with the tropes of love.

Second, the introduction also worked to widen the field. I’ll spare you a full version, but some of it bears repeating, since I set up why we need to have a discussion about war and peace that does not accept the boundaries regarding who has the right to speak about what.

Having recently completed *Behind the Lines*, a study of war resistance poetry, I proposed an event where both “war” poems and “peace” poems would be represented, poems written by both veterans and civilians. This desire comes out of my argument against the critical doxa that war poetry by soldiers is the only successful poetry about war, and that antiwar poetry almost always fails. There is may be some general truth to such a statement, since the autobiographical lyric mode of poetry has favored attempts to represent war from immediate experience.





Vietnam-veteran Yusef Komunyakaa and Iraq War-veteran Brian Turner, have stunning examples of such poetry—though their poetry is not limited to the eyewitness mode, nor to poetry about war, for that matter.




Yet in poems such as “You and I Are Disappearing,” or “2000 lbs.,” Komunyakaa and Turner reach beyond immediate experience, and become along with us witnesses to the almost-unspeakable encounter with the violence of war.

At the same time, in an age in which we live at the center of empire, and in which, to paraphrase William James, "the real war is the endless preparation for war," both veterans and civilians have a part to play in representing war and its iterations.



In a sense, the distinction between soldier and civilian experiences is blurred by such figures as Iraqi poet Dunya Mikhail, who lived through wars in the 1980s and 1990s, and whose poems such as “The War Works Hard” give voice to civilian experiences of the depradations of war.





Jorie Graham, the daughter of a war correspondent, whose recent book dramatizes Operation Overlord during the Second World, collaging the voices of troops from both sides of the conflict, as she attempts to grapple with the massiveness of mass violence.




Finally, poet Gary Snyder has confronted the ways in which war permeates our physical, psychic, and creative existences—for war is not just man against man, but man against the planet.

Finally, each of these poets in their own way has also worked to imagine peace. Thus, the entire framing of the event was an attempt to problematize our way of thinking about peace and war—not just representing war, dramatizing war, writing war (hard enough to chew over in the short time allowed).

My fear is that Mr. Doerksen leaves the impression (intentional or not) that: 1) American civilians have nothing to say about war, since they have no first hand experience of it; 2) military veterans have the only important things to say about war, and 3) there is no point in thinking about what is the beyond of war, the relationship between peace and war. By beginning with his excoriation of Graham’s reading, and ending with his belittling of Snyder’s comments, it frames the event as incoherent and probably not meaning much, despite its being “generally interesting and often deeply affecting.” For this admittedly partisan and interested listener, I found Snyder’s talk to be enormously tonic, as he reframed and braided earlier ideas and words into a longer view; as the event continued, it (and we with it) moved both temporally and geographically, almost archeologically—from the Iraq War (Turner and Mikhail), to the Vietnam War (Komunyakaa), to the Second World War (Graham), and finally, to the sedimentary layers where war and peace, violence and non-violence, are all in play (Snyder).

In the end, maybe Mr. Doerksen is correct; it’s difficult to see what is gained by another poetry reading, in the grand scheme of clashing states. Certainly, if it were just about selling books, poets should simply pull the plug. Yet I hold out for the notion that this writing is not meant as an end in itself. It is, or can be, part of a process of unwriting what’s already been decided, already been written (the war), as well as a process of making something else come into being (the peace). It requires not only of the poets, but of us, some attempt to go beyond the page, to enter into the possibilities articulated as language, but made real by embodied selves, citizens who witness, speak out, and refuse.

Monday, July 9, 2007

Voices from Guantanamo/The Cultural Work of Poetry




The following poems were forwarded to me by the Voices in Wartime education project, which has done some fine work to bring various narratives and perspectives to light that often don't make the front page news. University of Iowa Press is coming out with Poetry from Guantanamo: The Detainees Speak (2007). For more information about the book, go to NPR.org. These are a couple of the poems that appear on the Voices in Wartime site. These poems, it seems to me, demonstrate at a basic level why we need to continue to turn the discussion of poetry away from mere aesthetic criteria and discuss the cultural work that a poem can do, to quote Cary Nelson. These poems, if nothing else, invite us into the existential pain of judicial limbo, of indefinite detention, that these men have faced. Whether or not they are found guilty, they have been living a kind of hell, guilty before proven innocent, thanks to their offshore location at Guantanamo.

Is it True?
by Osama Abu Kadir

Is it true that the grass grows again after rain?
Is it true that the flowers will rise up again in the Spring?
Is it true that birds will migrate home again?
Is it true that the salmon swim back up their streams?
It is true. This is true. These are all miracles.
But is it true that one day we'll leave Guantanamo Bay?
Is it true that one day we'll go back to our homes?
I sail in my dreams. I am dreaming of home.
To be with my children, each one part of me;
To be with my wife and the ones that I love;
To be with my parents, my world's tenderest hearts.
I dream to be home, to be free from this cage.
But do you hear me, oh Judge, do you hear me at all?
We are innocent, here, we've committed no crime.
Set me free, set us free, if anywhere still
Justice and compassion remain in this world!

Shortly after 11 September, Osama Abu Kadir travelled to Pakistan to perform charity work in Afghanistan with the Islamic missionary group Tablighi Jamat. The US claims Tablighi was providing fighters for jihad in Afghanistan and arrested Mr Kadir near Jalalabad in November 2001. In his native Jordan, he was known as a dedicated family man who worked as a truck driver. In Guantanamo, he is known as prisoner number 651. To read this poem online go to voicesinwartime.org.
Death Poem
by Jumah al Dossari

Take my blood.
Take my death shroud and
The remnants of my body.
Take photographs of my corpse at the grave, lonely.
Send them to the world,
To the judges and
To the people of conscience,
Send them to the principled men and the fair-minded.
And let them bear the guilty burden, before the world,
Of this innocent soul.
Let them bear the burden, before their children and before history,
Of this wasted, sinless soul,
Of this soul which has suffered at the hands of the "protectors of peace".

Arrested in Pakistan and held in solitary confinement since 2003, Jumah al Dossari's mental wellbeing is worrying his lawyers. The 33-year old Bahraini national has tried to kill himself 12 times since his incarceration in Guantanamo. On one visit, his lawyer found him hanging in a bedsheet noose, with a deep gash in one wrist. In a letter Mr Dossari wrote in 2005, he said: "The purpose of Guantanamo is to destroy people and I have been destroyed."

Saturday, July 7, 2007

Sinan Antoon, Iraqi Poet, on "Democracy Now"




One of the stunning aspects of this latest Iraq War is how Iraqis themselves have participated in the counternarrative, even as the war is still grinding on. Bloggers such as Salam Pax, Riverbend, and many writers and journalists, not to mention the countless anonymous stringers for such reporters as Anne Garrells, have made the representation of this war utterly different from the first Persian Gulf War. There are some parallels to the ways in which the North Vietnamese made publicity part of their insurgency strategy. Yet, these voices are not representing the insurgency but attempting to speak on behalf of the Iraqi people, in the scattered networks of new decentered empire. Listen/read transcript of Amy Goodman's conversation with Iraqi poet, Sinan Antoon, whose recent book, The Baghdad Blues, came out earlier this year.

Here is one of his poems, "A Prism: Wet with Wars," which vaguely recalls another great Iraqi poet, Fadhil al-Azzawi's "A Toast,":

this is the chapter of
devastation
this is our oasis
an angle where wars intersect
tyrants accumulate around our eyes
in the shackle's verandah
there is enough space for applause
let us applaud

another evening climbs
the city's candles
technological hoofs crush the night
a people is being slaughtered across short waves
but the radio vomits raw statements
and urges us to
applaud

with a skeleton of a burning umbrella
we receive this rain
a god sleeps on our flag
but the horizon is prophetless
maybe they will come if we
applaud
let us applaud

we will baptize our infants with smoke
plough their tongues
with flagrant war songs
or UN resolutions
teach them the bray of slogans
and leave them beside burning nipples
in an imminent wreckage
and applaud

before we weave an autumn for tyrants
we must cross this galaxy of barbed wires
and keep on repeating
HAPPY NEW WAR!

Larissa Shmailo's "Exorcism"/Found Poems, Incantations

Larissa Shmailo sent along this poem, which employs all sorts of found fragments from multiple sources, to create an incantatory "exorcism." I've been thinking about her repetition of "I stand on holy ground" as both a performative act (that is, to make the ground holy, the ground that we have too often drenched in our own blood), and a critical questioning of what it means when we call the ground holy. Naomi Shihab Nye, in her poem "Jerusalem," phrases it this way: "are people the only holy land?"

"Exorcism" (Found Poem) by Larissa Shmailo

Adapted from “Group Dynamics,” People of the Lie--
The Hope for Healing Human Evil by M. Scott Peck,
and “The Forging of the Malevolent Personality,”
Speaking with the Devil, by Carl Goldberg

I stand on holy ground
I stand on holy ground
I stand on holy ground
I stand on holy ground
I stand on holy ground

Consecration: On the morning of March 16, 1968
Elements of Task Force Barker
Charlie Company Task Force Barker
Moved into a small group of hamlets
In the Quang Ngai province of South Vietnam
Collectively known as My Lai

It was a routine mission
To search and destroy
A typical mission
To search and destroy

The soldiers were poorly trained and hastily assembled
They were tired, poorly trained, and hastily assembled
They had sustained casualties from booby traps and mines
They had not engaged the enemy but sustained casualties
Had had no military success for over a month
The soldiers were poorly trained.

The soldiers were probably not aware of the Geneva Convention
Which states it is a war crime to kill a civilian
A punishable crime to kill a civilian
To kill a soldier or enemy who has surrendered
Who is wounded and has laid down his arms
To kill a noncombatant

They were probably not aware of the Law of Land Warfare
In the Army Field Manual, the U.S. Army Field Manual
Which specifies that orders in violation of the Geneva Convention
Any order in violation of the Geneva Convention
Is illegal and not to be obeyed

The soldiers were poorly trained

The written orders were ambiguous
The My Lai orders were ambiguous
Just waste the place, a Louie said
A Louie might have said

Though essentially all elements of Task Force Barker
Were involved in some way in the My Lai operation
The primary element of ground troop involved
Was C Company 1st Battalion of the 20th infantry
Of the 11th Light Infantry Brigade

When Charlie Company moved into the hamlets of My Lai
They found no combatants not a single combatant
Only old men and children, unarmed women, men, and children
All civilian and unarmed

The troops of C Company killed five to six hundred
The troops of C Company killed five to six hundred
The troops of C Company killed five to six hundred
Civilians on that day

The killings took a long time

The people were killed in a variety of ways
In some instances troops would simply stand at a hut
And spray it with fire or throw hand grenades
In other instances villagers including small children
Were shot as they attempted to escape

The killings took a long time

The most large scale killings occurred at My Lai 4
There the first platoon of Charlie Company
Commanded by Lieutenant Calley
Herded villagers into groups of twenty or more
Who were then shot down by rifle fire
Machine guns and hand grenades

The killings took a long time

The number of soldiers can only be estimated
Perhaps only fifty actually killed the civilians
Perhaps just two hundred watched them shoot the civilians
Only just some two hundred directly witnessed the killings
By the end of the massacre approximately 500
Knew of operation My Lai

None of them reported the crimes

A helicopter pilot in flyby to the mission
A warrant officer in air support in flyby to the mission
Could see from the air what was happening in the hamlets
He landed, tried to talk to the troops on the ground
Then went airborne and radioed headquarters from his copter
Told his superior officers what he saw at My Lai
They did not seem concerned

The soldiers were poorly trained

When a panel was convened
Four years later to investigate
The events at My Lai
They inquired if this atrocity
Was similar or different
From other war crimes
Which had occurred
In this and other American wars

They noted that no study
Had ever been made
Of any war crimes or atrocities
Committed by Americans at war
And requested that a study
Of the subject might be made

The panel was told that the current administration
At the time would be embarrassed by the findings of the panel
And that further studies or embarrassment
That might ensue from such a study
Was inadvisable at the time

Lieutenant Calley was convicted
For his crimes at My Lai 4
But not his Captain Medina
His superior officer
Not Lieutenant Colonel Barker
Who Commanded Task Force Barker
Nor Lieutenant Barker’s com
Who said,
Boys let’s bring that coonskin home….

In Serbia a woman calls her youngest son now to her
She tells him to sit down she will now explain to him
Why his father has seemed cold harsh and cruel to him sometimes
She tells him of his life

When his father was a young boy at the time of the World War
He was captured by the Germans under guard at the railroad
He watched unarmed men and women emerge slowly from a boxcar
At the head of the ramp was a strong commanding figure
An SS man in the black uniform of the SS Medical Corp

He is singing Meistersinger as the people search for loved ones
For their children and their parents
German soldiers beat the people
As they run before the guns the SS officer shouts
In a commanding baritone voice

“Freeze. Listen. Do as I say.”

One very old man perhaps eighty years old
A scholarly old man who has fallen to the ground
His clothes are caked with mud and his eyeglasses are askew
A woman crawls up next to him as if she knew him well
He turns to her and says, “God. . . .perhaps the man. . .
In the black uniform. . .the imposing man in the black uniform,
Maybe they sent him to save us?”

The officer is singing as he points to the left
To the right and the left
And the prisoners are herded to the gates of a camp
And the young Yugoslav watched the people as they marched
As they hurried to the camps where they would die

And the mother turned around and she said to her son
In a voice he’d never heard his mother use to him before
She said your father learned that day what I will tell you right now

“It is better to be a Nazi and survive
It is better to be a Nazi and survive
It is better to be a Nazi and survive
Than one of those people so helpless and naïve
That they have no choice but to pray to their God
That the Nazis will save them from harm.”

The boy he was well-trained.

In Iowa in ’66 a boy gets into trouble
Sells some pot and gets himself caught
And he gets himself in trouble
And the judge says join the Army
Or you’re going to do some hard time
The boy signs up for Nam

I stand on holy ground
I stand on holy ground
I stand on holy ground
I stand on holy ground

I stand on holy ground
I stand on holy ground
I stand on holy ground
I stand on holy ground

Friday, July 6, 2007

Samih al-Qasim's "End of a Talk with a Jailer"/Walls and the Security State, continued




Ibis Editions recently published Sadder than Water, a small selected poetry edition of the poems of Samih al-Qasim, a Palestinian poet, reviewed in The Nation. One of the brilliant little poems of this fine bilingual book, is "End of a Talk with a Jailer"--a poem that articulates the ways in which 1) a security state like Israel, which imprisons and detains without charge thousands of Palestinians, comes to be imprisoned by its own fear and paranoia; 2) all of us are bounded by the cell of our own perceptive worlds. I'm thinking here of both the political notion of Shibley Telhami's "the prism of pain" and of the wider phenomenological and epistemological questionings of Berkeley and Wittgenstein.

"End of a Talk with a Jailer"

From the narrow window of my small cell,
I see trees that are smiling at me
and rooftops crowded with my family.
And windows weeping and praying for me.
From the narrow window of my small cell--
I can see your big cell!

Listen to this interview of Samih al-Qasim from The News Hour with Jim Lehrer.

Thursday, July 5, 2007

David-Baptiste Chirot's Raw War/The Walls of the Security State


David-Baptiste Chirot has been engaged in a project of visual/poetic art called "Raw War." About this work, he says, "I dream a lot of painting walls, or of walls on which visual poems are spontaneously taking place and are in movement. One of the great inspirations to me as an artist is Gulley Jimson, the fictional painter in Joyce Cary's novel THE HORSE'S MOUTH. Gulley loves to paint walls. I used to be a housepainter and painted many many walls, though not with words and forms until much later. These pieces are inspired by a dream I had the night before last, in which I dreamed of "War Torn Walls" in Palestine and Lebanon. I made these paintings in the dark in Lake Front Park in Milwaukee using grass, dirt, clay impression spray painting, rubBeings and even some gravel on one piece." Walls, of course, are rapidly becoming one of the embodiment of the new security wars--not simply as physical armorings of space against intruders, but as images of exclusions. There is a smart little poem by Samih Qasim on this subject for next time.